Archive for the ‘Strategy Development’ Category

Santa Claus and VUCA

Monday, December 15th, 2014

The Holiday season set me thinking.VUCA and its impact on strategy

One of the traditions in our version of the Holidays is the letter/email from each child to Santa Claus, the determination if the child has been naughty or nice and, assuming the latter, the resulting delivery of gifts on Christmas morning.

To execute successfully, Santa manufactures or purchases the gifts then packages and delivers them.

These operations take place in his workshop and distribution centre, located at the North Pole and staffed by elves.

This much we know for fact.

This year, however, there’s a question around Santa’s strategy which is of fundamental interest to all strategy consultants.

What is the impact, if any, of VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity)?

Academics and key figures in the consulting world appear to agree that VUCA exists. But that’s about it.

Because, while some say it has made strategy and strategic planning redundant, others argue it has no impact whatsoever on the need for an organization to develop and execute a coherent strategy.

It’s important at this point to determine Santa’s KPI’s.

The 2 critical performance factors are accuracy (the right kid gets the right toy) and on time delivery (the toys are delivered during the night on Christmas Eve). Quality is irrelevant because kids spend more time playing with the wrapping than with the presents.

It’s assumed that Santa has availed himself (I’m assigning a male orientation to the incumbent. A discussion of the suitability of other genders for the role is a topic for a future post) of all modern processes and technologies.

Lean manufacturing; warehouse management systems; mobile computing; performance-based compensation for elves; and video monitoring of child behavior, with NSA input on social media patterns; the use of ‘big data’ etc., etc., are all givens.

And Santa’s strategy is tried and tested over many years.

So the only variable is VUCA.

The only way we can be sure of the outcome is to wait until Christmas morning and conduct rapid research by monitoring social media trends and conducting structured telephone interviews with a representative sample of the population.

Now, I am not given to making predictions.

But, given the season, I am going to break this habit. I predict that Santa’s performance this year will be at least on a par with previous years.

Which means that VUCA will have had as little impact on his need for a strategy as it has on the needs of every other organization.

Happy Holidays!

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy 3 Techniques For Removing Bias From The Big Decisions

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Share

Be Known For The Things You Do – And For Those You Don’t

Tuesday, December 2nd, 2014

In last week’s post I spoke about one of the reasons I started ProfitPATH 12 years ago.let your business be known for the things you do - and for those you don't

I wanted to create a company that did things differently to the way in which management consultants traditionally behaved.

To act as a guide, I made a list of all the things consultants I’d hired over the years had done that had annoyed me – and said we’ll do the opposite.

While I’ve often spoken about the list, I’ve never actually publicized it.

Now I’ve decided to change that. As a start, I thought we’d replace some of the outdated content on our current web site with the list.

I had to dig through some really old files but I found the original piece of paper on which I’d written the list.

Here it is.

We exist to help business owners achieve the results they want for their companies.  To do that we will:

1.   Tell clients when:

•  We don’t know how to do what they need. We will focus on what we do best.
•  They can do something by themselves. We will not bill clients for unnecessary work.
•  We don’t understand their requirements – even if it makes us look silly. We will not risk missing their expectations.
•  They ask us to provide “silver bullet” solutions. The Lone Ranger may have those – but we don’t.
•  We can’t provide what they need at the price or to meet the schedule they want. We will not “agree now, modify later”.

2.  Adapt and use tools and processes that we know deliver results. We will not use clients as guinea pigs.

3.  Design our services so that we can see the results of our work. We will not write reports and walk away.

4.  Find ways to link our compensation to the results of our work. This will be hard but we will not give up.

5.  Allow clients to terminate a project at any time – without a financial penalty.

6.  Always offer references. Where possible from clients of a similar size, in a similar industry.

7.  Submit proposals which contain absolutely no surprises – because they include only things we’ve already discussed with the client.

After seeing the list again I’m proud of how we’ve run the business.

However, I’m wondering what, if anything I missed.

What do you think?

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy The Elusive ‘Silver Bullet’

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Lists That Last

Tuesday, November 25th, 2014

It’s funny how 2 unrelated events often come together to produce a completely unexpected outcome.Stay focused on the list of your company's set principles to maintain consistent success

In this case, the first event is that we recently decided to undertake a long overdue revamp of our web site. As a result, I’ve been thinking about the changes we need to make to our content.

The second is that I’m re-reading Jim Collins’ book “Built To Last” which employs his now familiar technique of contrasting Visionary companies with less successful Comparison companies.

One of the differences between them is that the Visionary companies all had a well-articulated core ideology.

Collins credits that core ideology with keeping the company focused on a set of principles that it practiced consistently through the decades. That focus was a major contributor to the Visionary companies consistent success.

That set me thinking.

When I started ProfitPATH 12 years ago, I had 2 reasons for doing so.

One was to share the tools and techniques I’d learned working for some remarkable companies, on 3 different continents. This didn’t mean I knew more than other people. I just knew different things.

The second was to do things differently to traditional consulting companies.

In fact, I made a list of all the things the consultants I’d hired over the years had done that had annoyed me and said – we’ll do the opposite.

I’ve often spoken about that list to colleagues and clients over the years, and I try very hard to live by it every day.

But, apart from the original scrap of paper I scribbled it on, I’ve never actually written it down or publicized it.

Now I’m going to change that.

That list is going to replace the outdated content that inhabits one of the pages on our current web site.

There are, of course, a couple of challenges.

Those of you who know me will agree that I have really bad handwriting. So, even if I could find the piece of paper on which I wrote the list, I probably wouldn’t be able to read it.

Fortunately, I remember most of the items quite well as I have verbally shared them often. The others will come back to me as I’m writing down the former.

I’ll share the list with you next week. And you can tell me what you think before I put them on the web site.

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy The Elusive ‘Silver Bullet’

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Can Strategic Planning Pay Off?

Tuesday, November 18th, 2014

“The most fundamental weakness of most corporate plans today is that they do not lead to the major decisions that must be made currently to ensure the success of the enterprise in the future.”Key factors to make strategic planning pay off

It sounds like something I might have written in one of my blog posts because the point applies equally to owner-managed businesses.

But, regrettably, it wasn’t.

It’s from an article written by a 31-year-old, who then goes on to say:

“…..Nothing really new happens as a result of the plan, except that everyone gets a warm glow of security and satisfaction now that the uncertainty of the future has been contained……”

Does that sound familiar? The author goes on to say:

“……too many managements fail to…….recognize that the end product of strategic analysis should not be plans but current decisions.”

He then lists the reasons why decisions aren’t made:

• It’s risky – a bad decision could jeopardize the company.

• It’s difficult – “Strategic planning….deals with the most complex questions facing a company……synthesizing critical issues and strategic options to resolve those issues….is fundamentally a creative process. Many…..find it an elusive, uncomfortable task.”

• It requires leadership – making controversial decisions requires a willingness to be tough-minded.

• The value system works against it – owners often emphasize short-term results, which have little to do with long-term strategic success.

Next the author points out that “Many planning systems simply….produce forecasts of financial results, or statements of objectives”.

This is “….momentum” planning as opposed to dynamic planning that is attuned to the realities of external change……..

To deal with this, emphasis must be given to 3 things – evaluating the external environment; thorough evaluation of competitive strategies; and developing contingency plans.

Finally, the author provides 2 recommendations for motivating the people who can make or break a strategy. Involve those who will actually have to execute the strategy and adapt reward systems to recognize longer-term performance and the achievement of strategic goals.

So, which of today’s leading thinkers wrote the article? None of them did.

An up-and-coming member of the McKinsey team called Lou Gerstner (of IBM fame) wrote the article in 1973.

I like the article because it addresses all 4 of the Risks we believe growing companies face – having a Clear Growth Plan; linking it to Action; getting Buy In and holding people Accountable.

You can find the full article here.

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy Strategic Planning – 3 Things That Are Wrong With It

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Recommended Reading – Winter 2014

Tuesday, November 11th, 2014

Hello, winter!  Snowflakes are dancing on the air and covering the land in a wardrobe of white.  A touch of arctic air is pinching our noses and cheeks.  Time to get comfortable and pick up a good book. Here are some of the personal favourites we’ve selected from the various “best books in 2014” lists published recently on 800ceo read’s blog:

Drawing upon a six-year research project at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras took eighteen truly exceptional and long-lasting companies and studied each in direct comparison to one of its top competitors. They examined the companies from their very beginnings to the present day — as start-ups, as mid-size companies, and as large corporations. Throughout, the authors asked: “What makes the truly exceptional companies different from the comparison companies and what were the common practices these enduringly great companies followed throughout their history?” Filled with hundreds of specific examples and organized into a coherent framework of practical concepts that can be applied by managers and entrepreneurs at all levels, Built to Last provides a master blueprint for building organizations that will prosper long into the 21st century and beyond.

Obviously, there are lots of things that matter now. But in a world of fractured certainties and battered trust, some things matter more than others. While the challenges facing organizations are limitless; leadership bandwidth isn’t. That’s why you have to be clear about what really matters now. What are the fundamental, make-or-break issues that will determine whether your organization thrives or dives in the years ahead? Hamel identifies five issues are that are paramount: values, innovation, adaptability, passion and ideology. In doing so he presents an essential agenda for leaders everywhere who are eager to…move from defense to offense, reverse the tide of commoditization, defeat bureaucracy, astonish their customers, foster extraordinary contribution, capture the moral high ground, outrun change, build a company that’s truly fit for the future. Concise and to the point, “What Matters Now” will inspire you to rethink your business, your company and how you lead.

A guide for protecting your wealth in an age of turbulent business cycles. In “Prosperity in the Age of Decline”, Brian and Alan Beaulieu offer an informed, meticulously-researched look at the future and the coming Great Depression.

Surprisingly, most companies fail not because demand is low or conditions are difficult, but simply because they don’t know how to manage, nurture, or even maintain their own growth and success. At each developmental stage, they become vulnerable to chaos, no matter how strong or expert their leaders. Most leaders feel a sense of isolation, assuming they have to know it all and end up making critical mistakes. Dando calls these critical mistakes the 12 Warning Signs of Success, and he helps leaders across industries identify, anticipate, and avoid them on the way from startup to Fortune 500. Maybe you’ve hired the wrong person, have too many direct reports, or say yes to everything; you might believe your own hype, incentivize failure, or lose track of your core values. Dando, known in leadership circles as the Company Whisperer, encountered all the same challenges as a C-level executive in a high-growth billion-dollar business, and he knows that these moments of truth determine whether the leader and the company become a strong, mature, and sustainable organization, or drift toward an uncertain future.

If you’re aiming to innovate, failure along the way is a given. But can you fail “better”? Whether you’re rolling out a new product from a city-view office or rolling up your sleeves to deliver a social service in the field, learning why and how to embrace failure can help you do better, faster. Smart leaders, entrepreneurs, and change agents design their innovation projects with a key idea in mind: “ensure that every failure is maximally useful. In “Fail Better”, Anjali Sastry and Kara Penn show how to create the conditions, culture, and habits to systematically, ruthlessly, and quickly figure out what works, in three steps:
1. Launch every innovation project with the right groundwork
2. Build and refine ideas and products through iterative action
3. Identify and embed the learning
You may be a “Fortune” 500 manager, scrappy start-up innovator, social impact visionary, or simply leading your own small project. If you aim to break through without breaking the bank–or ruining your reputation—“Fail Better” is for you.

An insider’s look at how a successful leadership pipeline can make or break a company Starting out at GE, where he headed up the company’s leadership institute and revamped the leadership pipeline under Jack Welch, Noel Tichy has served as a trusted advisor on management succession to such leading companies as Royal Dutch Shell, Nokia, Intel, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Merck and Caterpillar. Now Tichy draws on decades of hands-on experience working with CEOs and boards to provide a framework for building a smart, effective transition pipeline, whether for a multi-billion dollar conglomerate, a family business, a small start-up, or a non-profit. Through revealing case studies like Hewlett Packard, IBM, Yahoo, P&G, Intel, and J.C. Penney, he examines why some companies fail and others succeed in training and sustaining the next generation of senior leaders. He highlights the common mistakes that can generate embarrassing headlines and may even call an organization’s survival into question, and reveals the best practices of those who got it right. Tichy also positions leadership talent development and succession where they belong: at the top of every leader’s agenda.

The market for business knowledge is booming as companies looking to improve their performance pour millions of dollars into training programmes, consultants, and executive education. Why then, are there so many gaps between what firms know they should do and what they actual do? This volume confronts the challenge of turning knowledge about how to improve performance into actions that produce measurable results. The authors identify the causes of this gap and explain how to close it.

According to a study published in “Chief Executive Magazine,” the most valued skill in leaders today is strategic thinking. However, more than half of all companies say that strategic thinking is the skill their senior leaders most need to improve. “Elevate” provides leaders with a framework and toolkit for developing “advanced” strategic thinking capabilities. Unlike the majority of books that focus on strategy from a corporate perspective, “Elevate” gives the individual executive practical tools and techniques to help them become a truly strategic leader. The new framework that will enable leaders to finally integrate both strategy and innovation into a strategic
approach that drives their profitable growth is the Three Disciplines of “Advanced” Strategic Thinking:
1. Coalesce: Fusing together insights to create an innovative business model.
2. Compete: Creating a system of strategy to achieve competitive advantage.
3. Champion: Leading others to think and act strategically to execute strategy.
Every leader desperately wants to be strategic – their career depends on it. “Elevate” provides the roadmap to reach the strategic leadership summit.

“Escape Velocity” offers a pragmatic plan to engage the most critical challenge that established enterprises face in the twenty-first-century economy: how to move beyond past success and drive next-generation growth from new lines of business.
As he worked with senior management teams, Moore repeatedly found that executives were trapped by short-term performance-based compensation schemes. The result was critical decision-makers overweighting their legacy commitments, an embarrassingly low success rate in new-product launches, and a widespread failure to sustain any kind of next-generation business at scale.
In “Escape Velocity”, Moore presents a cogent strategy for generating future growth within an established enterprise. Organized around a hierarchy of powers: category power, company power, market power, offer power, and execution power, this insightful work shows how each level of power can be orchestrated to achieve overall success.

In this work, noted consultant Erika Andersen helps the reader approach business and life strategically, explaining why it is important, what’s involved in doing it, and how to do it. 

For a full listing of best books in 2014, please visit http://800ceoread.com/

 

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Strategy, Motherhood, The Dog and Its Tail

Tuesday, November 4th, 2014

Do you remember that old expression “The tail’s wagging the dog”?The tail's wagging the dog or, the process is more important than the result

It was used to describe situations in which, for example, a process for doing something takes on more importance than the result it produces.

Why did I think of that now?

Simply, for many companies, this is the time of year in which they begin their strategic or business planning.

This process is often viewed as unproductive, frustrating, even pointless or a waste of time. So it may not be welcomed with enthusiasm.

Why is that?

After 13 years of working with business owners and their teams, I have a few ideas:

1.  Strategy development is a difficult, creative, iterative activity. But in many organizations the ‘planning’ process has to be completed in a predetermined period of time, in the same month or quarter, every year. That’s the tail wagging the dog.

2.  We use terms like strategic planning, business planning, and even budgeting, interchangeably as if they all refer to the same thing. They don’t.

  • Strategy development involves making well thought out choices about the future.
  • Business planning is about the activities that have to be completed in the next 12 months to execute the strategy.
  • Budgeting is estimating the financial outcomes of the activities in the annual business plan.

3.  If we’re not clear about what we’re setting out to do, everyone will expect a different outcome and no one will end up getting the result they wanted.

4.  Worse, the results we do get may not be useful. By trying to do more than one thing at a time, we end up doing none of them well. The result is a breathtaking series of ‘motherhood’ statements that are neither a strategy nor focused action plans.

5.  We begin the process with a budget, the financial targets the owner wants to achieve, and make the ‘strategy’ fit those. That, to use another metaphor, is putting the cart before the horse.

6.  Even if the results are useful, we don’t follow up. We are so busy dealing with day-to-day challenges there is simply no time. In reality, we lack discipline – not time.

Is it surprising that many business owners, executives, managers and employees are cynical about ‘planning’?

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy Strategy and Planning – How Business Owners Think

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Good Strategy Execution Pays Off

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

I’ve believed for many years that how a company executes its strategy is more important than how it develops the strategy.Good strategy execution pays off well when you focus on these 7 key capabilities

I’m talking about the business strategy, the one that deals with all parts, departments or functions of a company.

My point could also apply to departmental or specific strategies; for example, sales or marketing strategies, since theoretically, these all flow from the business strategy and are integrated with it.

Previously, I’ve never had any evidence to support my belief since common sense, apparently, does not qualify as evidence.

No more.

Earlier this year, no less an authority than McKinsey & Company¹ gave me evidentiary support for my arguments.

They used their Implementation Capability Assessment to separate companies that are good at execution from those that aren’t. The survey then found that good implementers:

  • Maintain twice the value from their prioritized opportunities after 2 years.
  • Score their companies 30% higher on a series of financial performance indicators.

So there! Executing well pays off – literally.

How do you know if your company is a good implementer or a poor implementer?

McKinsey identified 7 key capabilities for executing well. Every company may have them to some extent. Yet businesses which are good at execution, are almost twice as good at them.

The 7 capabilities are:

  1. Ownership and commitment to execution at all levels of the company.
  2. Focus on a set of priorities.
  3. Clear accountability for specific actions.
  4. Effective management of execution using common tools.
  5. Planning for long-term commitment to execution.
  6. Continuous improvement during execution and rapid reaction to amend plans as required.
  7. Allocation of adequate resources and capabilities.

Finally, here’s the good news. Good implementers believe that execution is an individual discipline, which can be improved over time.

Does this confirm my belief that how a company executes its strategy is more important than how it develops the strategy?

Partially. More importantly, it does demonstrate that time spent improving a company’s ability to execute is time well invested.

As for the comparison to developing a strategy – I’ll just have to keep on looking.

______________________________________
¹ “Why Implementation Matters”, McKinsey & Company Insights, August 2014

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy To Grow or Not To Grow – That Is The Question

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

How Do You Know If Your Company Will Fail?

Tuesday, October 21st, 2014

Let me go back almost 20 years to give you some context.How do business owners know if their company is on the path to decline?

My last real job (that’s what my wife calls the jobs I had before I became a consultant) was running the Canadian subsidiary of a 100-year-old, multi-national corporation.

Our owners, a much larger, publicly listed corporation, had bought us years before as a ‘cash cow’. There was, therefore, very limited investment in any aspect of the operations.

When I joined, the core business was rapidly being replaced by a new technology. We developed a new strategy for Canada and quickly set about executing it.

But, even when we appeared to be having some success with the new strategy, I used to ask myself if it was already too late – and how I would know if it was.

Now let’s return to the present day.

I’m re-reading Jim Collins’ book “How The Mighty Fall”. It was written as a result of a CEO asking how he would know if his company, successful as it had been, was already on the path to decline.

Imagine me asking the same question as the CEO of one of America’s most successful companies – several years before he asked it. It would indeed be remarkable, were it not for a few important details.

Clearly the circumstances were different. The CEO was being more farsighted than my employers had been.

And, more importantly, I’ll bet that many business owners have worried – and still worry – over the same question. I’m sure they started long before I asked it and some are still asking it now.

So why even raise the topic?

For one thing, if Collins’ book had been available in the mid-1990s, I would have had my answer. I would have known that, in time, the company would be sold to a competitor and, when that didn’t work, be absorbed by another competitor and almost completely disappear.

For another, “How The Mighty Fall” should be mandatory reading for all business owners. Or at least for those who understand that their past successes offer no guarantee, or even protection, for the future.

One point that caught my attention – and I’m only on page 48 – is that complacency was responsible for only one of the failed companies.

Another is that being an innovator was no protection from failure.

I would have assumed the opposite in both cases. So, perhaps I’m not as far ahead as I thought…………

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy Targets Are Targets, Results Are Reality

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Knowing and Doing – The Difference Affects Results

Tuesday, October 14th, 2014

There are advantages to getting older.Knowing the right thing to do and doing it to get results

Knowing the right thing to do.

One is you realize that to be successful, you only have to apply a few simple principles, most of which contain an element of common sense.

Another is that you learn that applying those principles is surprisingly difficult to do.

This last pearl of hard-earned wisdom helps when I read articles and posts about ways to improve business results, that we’ve known about for years.

It prevents me from becoming cynical – even when the authors package them as a new breakthrough that only they were capable of making.

Why is that?

It’s because I know that we – owners, executives, and even consultants – are constantly blind-sided by the day-to-day pressures of running a business. And that makes us lose sight of these fundamentally simple, common sense concepts.

So there’s a real benefit to having them repeated.

Doing the right thing.

Someone much smarter than I am once said “Knowing the right thing to do isn’t difficult. Doing the right thing is what’s difficult.”

I know that’s true.

We work every day with business owners and their teams who often know what to do to be successful (they have a good strategy) but who have difficulty actually doing those things (executing their strategy).

We’re no smarter than they are.

But we have the benefit of being able to focus on linking their strategy to action, helping them get buy-in throughout their organization and then holding them accountable for doing what they said they would.

No distractions for us.

Staying focused on a manageable number of activities which will have a high impact on the future and produce a high return on the resources invested in them, produces good business results.

No surprises there, right?

I could have used a bunch of big words to make the same point.

Or I could have proclaimed this was a new technique that would guarantee results.

But it’s not. It’s wisdom that’s been well proven over time.

Something, however, that bears repeating by a third party that, because of their perspective, can see woods without being blinded by the trees.

It’s worth thinking about as many of us head into annual business planning season.

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy A Lesson in Strategy Execution from a Successful Business Owner

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

 

Jim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

7 Ways to Hold Consultants Accountable Now

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2014

7 ways to hold consultants accountable nowMy wife will tell you I like giving other people advice.

That’s probably why I’m a management consultant.

But even consultants have to take some of their own advice – and change in order to grow.

For example, we must find a process for linking our compensation to our results in a meaningful way.

There’s no doubt this is hard to do. But that’s no excuse for refusing to try.

However, at the risk of making a huge understatement, it’s going to take time.

So, while we’re waiting, what can a business owner do to make sure the consultants they hire actually deliver results?

1. I talked about our own solution to linking compensation to results last year in a post called “Let’s Hold Consultants Responsible For Results”. It isn’t perfect, but it’s better than the traditional model.

2. Four years ago I suggested how owners can keep control when they work with consultants.

3. Around the same time I highlighted 3 reasons why consulting engagements fail. It’s really not difficult to avoid making them.

4. Look for consultants who have had practical, “hands on” experience operating a company. They have 2 clear advantages over consultants who have spent their entire career in consulting roles, as I pointed out in 2011.

5. There are also clues that you can listen for. Consultants who are effective tend to say certain things.

Here are 2 more things that I thought about this week.

6. Yesterday I was talking to a business owner who had been referred by an existing client. He asked if I would go out and meet him. I agreed immediately because that’s the only way to determine if there’s any chemistry between us.

Some people might consider the idea of “chemistry” to be foolish. But I can tell you from experience, that without it, the risk of a project failing increases dramatically.

7. Ask what success will look like. It’s more than just a description of what the consultant’s going to do and the services they’ll deliver. It’s about knowing how, when and what they will do to help you get the results you want.

Success, they say, comes not from doing one big thing well, but from doing many little things well. Perhaps change is like that too.

We at ProfitPATH, and lots of other consultants, are chipping away, doing the necessary things that will bring change to our business.

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

Jim StewartJim Stewart is the founding Partner at ProfitPATH. He has been working with business owners for over 16 years to increase profits and improve the value of their companies. LinkedIn

Post History