Posts Tagged ‘buyer’

Buying A Company As Part Of A Growth Strategy

Tuesday, June 4th, 2013

Acquisitions fail far more often than they succeed. You can easily find statistics to prove that.Acquisitions fail far more often than they succeed.

If you’re not a numbers person, then you only have to think of AOL and Time Warner; and News Corp and MySpace.

Those are all big corporations, I know, but it’s nice to see the big guys get a bloody nose every now and then.

Buying another company, as part of a growth strategy, isn’t something that we see often.

It’s probably done most frequently when a client buys a smaller competitor in a Province, State or country they’re not already in. They’re quickly expanding their existing business by adding experienced sales, service and support staff where they had none.

What’s even less common is seeing a client buy a company whose products and services are “complimentary” to theirs.

There’s a lot for privately-owned businesses to worry about with acquisitions.

For a start, there’s getting a fair valuation for the target company and being thorough in due diligence to make sure nothing is missed. If a ‘biggie’ like Hewlett-Packard can make a mistake (with Autonomy), then anyone can.

Then, when the deal is done, there’s the whole challenge of integrating the people, who may be used to doing things in a completely different way. Not to mention different (and often incompatible) accounting and CRM systems.

When business owners buy a company for the first time, they often underestimate the lack of direct control they have over their new acquisition. And it seems to increase with the distance between the parent company and the new one. (Compare driving across a city to flying across the country to “sort something out”.)

So, why bother?

Because, like many things in life, it’s not what you do, it’s how you do it. Go back to the ‘biggies’ again for a moment and think about Google and YouTube or Best Buy and Geek Squad. Done well, acquisitions provide a great return on investment.

There’s research that says if a company is bought to expand the existing business, then it should be absorbed into the buyer as quickly as possible. Signage, letterhead and all other image stuff must be changed to that of the parent company. Duplicated or conflicting processes and systems must also be replaced. But if the acquisition is made to complement the buyer’s business, then the new subsidiary is best run separately and left with it’s own identity.

Which makes sense if you think about it this way. ABC company buys XYZ company.

If the XYZ is same business as ABC, the owner and management team at ABC already have been successful in that business and, hopefully, know why. XYZ should be folded into ABC.

If the XYZ is in a separate, but complimentary, business or industry, XYZ’s owner and management team have presumably been successful. Otherwise, ABC would have bought another company. So ABC should leave them alone.

All of which will make watching Yahoo’s acquisition of Tumblr interesting…..

 

If you enjoyed this post you’ll also enjoy Are Your Core Competencies Coming – Or Going?

Click here and automatically receive our latest blog posts.

Share

Post History