Posts Tagged ‘contingency plans’

6 Tips for Getting Better Results in 2011.

Monday, November 8th, 2010

In a recent blog posting I wrote that business planning has started/is starting/should have started for 2011. Then the other day I came across these 6 tips which I pulled together at the end of 2008.

At that time, you may remember, there was a deluge of bad news pouring from the newspapers, Internet and TV all day, every day. Some forecasters were saying the economy would rally in late 2009, others were saying it would take years before we saw an improvement.

I made the point then that, when so much of what is going on around you seems out of control, it’s easy to stop focussing on the things that are under your control. So, since uncertainty is still with us, I thought it was worth freshening up the Tips.

Tip #1 – Remember that we have always had to deal with uncertainty when developing plans and strategies. It may be true that there is more uncertainty now than in the past. However, don’t forget that no one has ever been able to accurately predict the future with any degree of consistency.

Three ways to deal with uncertainty are – keep digging until you find the best information available before firming up assumptions; put flexibility into plans and strategies; and think through contingency plans (e.g. plan for the best, worst, and most likely outcomes and be ready to deal with all of them). A fourth technique is to review, and adjust, goals more frequently.

Tip #2 – Make sure that you actually implement your plans and strategies. According to an Ernst & Young survey, 66% of corporate strategy is never executed.

In our experience implementation is handled just as poorly in owner managed companies – which generally have fewer employees (who are often located in the same premises) and which have fewer departments and layers. All of which should make communication and coordination easier.

There are a number of reasons why strategy implementation fails and the remaining tips will help you avoid them.

Tip #3 – Develop detailed Action Plans for execution. Involve key people when figuring out your goals for 2011 – and they’ll buy into what has to be done.

Compare the goals with the current situation and gaps will appear. Then ask them what – specifically – has to be done to close the gaps, by whom and by when. The answers to those questions will form the basis of your Action Plans for 2011.

Tip #4 – Avoid attempting too much, for 2 reasons. Firstly, there may be a long list of things to be done to close the gaps and no company has the resources to attack them all. So, prioritize the things which have the most impact on your goals and focus on them. You can go back and tackle the others later.

Secondly, you want to stay flexible enough to respond to whatever happens.

Tip #5 – Commit enough resources to completing the priorities. Business owners are inclined to tackle too much at once. They also try to do everything in the minimum amount of time – while spending as little money as possible.

Think about the priorities this way. You’ve invested time identifying reasonable goals and figuring out what has to be done to reach them. That effort will be wasted unless you commit the resources required to complete those action plans.

Even if you are allocating too many resources, you’ll complete the job ahead of schedule. Who doesn’t feel good when that happens?

Tip #6 – Follow up regularly and in a structured way. There are also 2 reasons for doing this. First, because no one can accurately predict the future you have to make time to compare what you thought would happen with what has happened and adjust for reality.

Second, what could be more important than making sure you complete the action plans that will lead to achieving your goals? Not dealing with the day-to-day problems, which always seem to be “urgent”. Prevent them getting in the way of the “important” priorities by making time to review progress toward your goals once a quarter.

The odds are that you’ve heard each one of these tips before. But the reality is that a gap exists between hearing – even knowing – the right thing to do and actually doing it. That’s why 66% of the companies surveyed wasted their time.

Winners eliminate the gap.

Share

It’s THAT Time of Year Again

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

The last quarter of the year can be very frustrating. In addition to the “normal” workload, there’s all the seasonal stuff to be done – what should our Holiday card say, what will we give people this year etc.? (O.K. so I am a Grinch.)

Second, the results for 2010 begin to take shape. Hopefully you’ll have a great year, possibly even so good that you’re not keeping up with demand. A less attractive, but still acceptable, alternative is that you’ll make your targets (if only just). The outcome that no one wants is that you’ll fall short of some or all of your goals.

Then, of course, strategic or business planning has started/is starting/should have started for next year. And what is happening in 2010 will affect the “mood” and possibly the approach, to that exercise.

By the way does anyone really enjoy strategic planning? And does it achieve anything in this age of constant change and heightened uncertainty? I saw 2 blog postings over the weekend that argued we can no longer do strategic planning as we’ve always done it.

The first, Time to Retire Strategic Planning and Adopt Innovation Strategy by Kamal Hassan, said that that strategic planning has become too formulaic and we’ve come to rely too much on what has worked in the past. But isn’t that argument rooted in the application of the process rather than the process itself?

Kamal went on to say that we currently study the past to plan the future but that history is no longer the best teacher. However, as someone (I think it was Winston Churchill) said, “If we don’t learn from history then we are doomed to repeat it”.

This posting closed with the comment that inventing the future is better than predicting it. To invent the future we have, amongst other things, to replace historical data with subjective data (customer surveys, competitor strategy, trends, gaps, etc.). But haven’t been doing these things for some time now? I know the companies we work with do.

While saying that attempting to define the business over a 3 or 5 year horizon is probably foolhardy at best, the second post Strategic Planning and Innovation by Jeffrey Phillips, did acknowledge that it is very important to define strategic milestones or goals and determine how the firm arrives at those goals.

Jeffrey thinks that these are more “tactical” activities than pure strategic planning. At the risk of splitting hairs, I’d say they’re more about execution of the strategy.

In closing Jeffrey says that he doubts we’ll ever see the end of “strategic planning” but that what we will see over time is the realization that innovation and trend management is the actionable part of the strategic planning process. And I tend to agree with that.

I was talking to a colleague today who articulated the point I want to make really well. The strategic planning process will always be with us but it must develop, as most things do, with time. However we must adapt the process rather than declare it hopelessly broken and throw every part of it away.

Forecasting several different scenarios, building assumptions on thorough, comprehensive research (formal and informal) and thinking through contingency plans are just some of the things we can – and must – do in this age of fast, unrelenting change. Looking at, and adjusting, our goals more frequently is also, I believe, simply good sense.

So, I think strategic planning is as relevant in this age of constant change and heightened uncertainty as it has always been. And I think it can accomplish as much, or as little, as we allow the links between strategy development and execution to achieve.

But as for enjoying it, well……….

Post History